Hi @Arunkumar K •
It's not recommended because the kerberos authentication cross forest will failed because due a conflict on name suffix routing applied on the forest trust.
Name Suffixes Routing controls routing of authentication traffic. When an user account attempts to authenticate using kerberos protocol on a service installed in other trusted forest, the Name Suffix Route applied on the forest trust is used to direct authentication requests to the trusted forest in order to establich kerberos authentification.
I recommend you to avoid to use the same DNS suffix between two trusted forests.
Please don't forget to accept helpful answer