complex aggregation before the reporting

Anshal 2,246 Reputation points
2024-07-08T07:57:51.46+00:00

Hi friends, we are considering having Microsoft analysis services before the data is pushed to PowerBI. The reason is to do complex aggregations and roll-ups. I did the analysis and Microsoft analysis services is expensive , I am confused. What should be typical use-cases for Analysis services before the BI and pros and cons of it. Particularly the cost factor associated with Microsoft analysis services.

Azure Data Lake Storage
Azure Data Lake Storage
An Azure service that provides an enterprise-wide hyper-scale repository for big data analytic workloads and is integrated with Azure Blob Storage.
1,466 questions
Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory
An Azure service for ingesting, preparing, and transforming data at scale.
10,681 questions
0 comments
Accepted answer
  1. Sumarigo-MSFT 46,126 Reputation points Microsoft Employee
    2024-07-08T09:37:20.26+00:00

    @Anshal Welcome to Microsoft Q&A Forum, Thank you for posting your query here!

    The decision to use Microsoft Analysis Services before pushing data to Power BI for complex aggregations and roll-ups is a significant one, especially considering the cost implications. Here's a breakdown of typical use-cases, pros and cons, and cost factors associated with Microsoft Analysis Services:

    Typical Use-Cases for Analysis Services:

    • Complex Data Modeling: When dealing with complex data models that require advanced calculations, hierarchies, and relationships, Analysis Services can provide the necessary computational power.
    • Large Datasets: For large volumes of data that need to be processed and summarized, Analysis Services can handle the load efficiently.
    • Enterprise-Level BI: It's well-suited for enterprise-level BI solutions where there is a need for robust, high-performance analytics.

    Pros of Analysis Services:

    • Performance: Offers high performance for complex queries and large datasets.
    • Scalability: Can scale to accommodate growing data and user demands.
    • Advanced Analytics: Supports advanced analytics capabilities like time-series analysis, forecasting, and machine learning.
    • Security: Provides strong security features for sensitive data.

    Cons of Analysis Services:

    • Cost: Can be expensive, especially for high-end options with more features and greater scalability.
    • Complexity: Might be overkill for simpler BI needs, leading to unnecessary complexity and maintenance.
    • Learning Curve: There is a learning curve associated with setting up and managing Analysis Services.

    Cost Factors:

    • Service Tier: The cost of Analysis Services can vary significantly based on the service tier selected, with higher tiers offering more resources and capabilities at a higher price.
    • Query Volume: The volume and complexity of the queries can impact the cost, as more intensive queries may require more resources.
    • Data Refresh Frequency: The frequency of data refreshes can also affect costs, with more frequent refreshes potentially requiring a higher tier of service.

    It's important to weigh these factors against your organization's specific needs and budget constraints. If the cost of Analysis Services is a concern, you might consider alternative solutions or a hybrid approach where only certain workloads that require the advanced capabilities of Analysis Services are processed there, while others are handled directly in Power BI.

    Remember, the right solution depends on a balance between performance needs and cost constraints. It's crucial to conduct a thorough analysis of your BI requirements and consult with stakeholders to make an informed decision.

    I would recommened to please reach out Azure Billing and Subscription team would be the best to provide more insight and guidance on this Cost based on your requirement : https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/support/options/

    Please let us know if you have any further queries. I’m happy to assist you further.    

    Please do not forget to "Accept the answer” and “up-vote” wherever the information provided helps you, this can be beneficial to other community members.

    0 comments

1 additional answer

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Amira Bedhiafi 24,531 Reputation points
    2024-07-08T09:53:58.5233333+00:00

    Typical Use-Cases for Microsoft Analysis Services (SSAS) Before BI:

    Microsoft Analysis Services is often used for complex aggregations and roll-ups, supporting both multidimensional OLAP cubes and tabular data models. It excels in advanced analytics, allowing for sophisticated operations like time-series and trend analysis. SSAS serves as a centralized data model repository, ensuring consistency across Power BI reports. It significantly enhances query performance in Power BI by pre-aggregating data and offers robust security features, enabling role-based access control and data encryption.

    Pros of Using Microsoft Analysis Services Before Power BI:

    SSAS optimizes performance by offloading complex calculations and aggregations, making it suitable for large datasets and enterprise-level deployments. It integrates seamlessly with the Microsoft ecosystem, including Azure Data Lake Storage and Azure Data Factory. SSAS supports complex data models and hierarchies, which can be reused across multiple reports, improving data governance. Additionally, it provides advanced security features to protect sensitive data.

    Cons of Using Microsoft Analysis Services:

    The main drawback of SSAS is its cost, encompassing licensing, infrastructure, and maintenance expenses. Setting up and managing SSAS requires specialized skills, adding to its complexity. Ongoing maintenance is necessary to ensure optimal performance and data accuracy. Using SSAS also ties you into the Microsoft ecosystem, potentially limiting flexibility. There can be a delay in data processing and refresh times, particularly for real-time analytics.

    Cost Factor Associated with Microsoft Analysis Services:

    Licensing costs for SSAS can be substantial, especially for enterprise editions of SQL Server that include SSAS. Running SSAS incurs infrastructure costs for hardware, storage, and compute resources, whether on-premises or in the cloud. Maintenance and support costs arise from the need for skilled professionals. If using Azure Analysis Services, consider costs for data processing units (DPUs), storage, and data transfer.

    Alternative Considerations:

    Consider using DirectQuery in Power BI for real-time data access without pre-aggregation. Azure Synapse Analytics offers integrated analytics services that might be more cost-effective with similar capabilities. Performing aggregations and transformations in Azure Data Lake Storage or Azure Data Factory before loading data into Power BI is another alternative.

    Ultimately, the decision to use Microsoft Analysis Services before Power BI depends on your specific use case, budget, and technical requirements. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis and exploring alternative solutions can help you make an informed decision.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.