Medallion in Synapse or Fabric?

DataCoder 160 Reputation points
2024-09-04T03:20:28.1033333+00:00

I'm evaluating the Medallion architecture for a data lakehouse setup, and I am trying to decide whether Azure Synapse Analytics or Microsoft Fabric is better suited for implementing this architecture. I would appreciate insights into which platform offers better performance, scalability, and ease of use when working with large datasets in a Medallion-based approach. Are there any significant differences in terms of integration with other services, cost-efficiency, or specific features that make one platform more suitable than the other?

Azure Synapse Analytics
Azure Synapse Analytics
An Azure analytics service that brings together data integration, enterprise data warehousing, and big data analytics. Previously known as Azure SQL Data Warehouse.
4,858 questions
Accepted answer
  1. NIKHILA NETHIKUNTA 1,760 Reputation points Microsoft Vendor
    2024-09-05T17:37:36.3733333+00:00

    @DataCoder
    Thank you for the question and using Microsoft Q&A platform.

    Both Azure Synapse Analytics and Microsoft Fabric have their strengths when it comes to implementing the Medallion architecture for a data lakehouse setup. Here’s a comparison to help you decide which platform might be better suited for your needs:

    Azure Synapse Analytics

    1. Performance and Scalability:
      • High Performance: Azure Synapse is designed for high-performance analytics and can handle large datasets efficiently.
      • Scalability: It offers scalable compute and storage resources, making it suitable for large-scale data processing and analytics.
    2. Ease of Use:
    • Integrated Environment: Synapse provides an integrated environment for data integration, big data, and data warehousing.
      • SQL and Spark: It supports both SQL and Apache Spark, allowing flexibility in data processing.
    1. Integration with Other Services:
      • Azure Ecosystem: Seamlessly integrates with other Azure services like Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure Machine Learning, and Power BI.
    2. Cost-Efficiency:
      • Pay-As-You-Go: Offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which can be cost-effective depending on your usage patterns.
    3. Specific Features:
      • Dedicated SQL Pool: Provides a dedicated SQL pool for high-performance data warehousing.
      • Serverless SQL Pool: Allows querying data in the data lake without provisioning resources.

    Microsoft Fabric

    1. Performance and Scalability:
    • Unified Analytics: Fabric is designed for unified analytics, integrating data engineering, data science, and business intelligence.
      • Scalability: It leverages Microsoft OneLake, which is designed to handle large volumes of data efficiently.
    1. Ease of Use:
      • SaaS Model: Fabric is a SaaS offering, which simplifies management and reduces the need for infrastructure provisioning.
      • User-Friendly: Provides a user-friendly interface and integrates well with Microsoft 365 applications.
    2. Integration with Other Services:
      • Microsoft Ecosystem: Integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, Power BI, and other Microsoft services.
      • OneLake: Uses OneLake as a unified data lake, reducing data silos and management effort.
    3. Cost-Efficiency:
      • Simplified Pricing: Fabric’s pricing model is designed to be straightforward, potentially reducing costs associated with infrastructure management.
    4. Specific Features:
      • Delta Lake Format: Uses Delta Lake format for data storage, which supports ACID transactions and improves data reliability.
      • No Need for Spark Pools: Unlike Synapse, Fabric does not require you to create and manage Apache Spark pools.

    Key Differences

    • Data Storage: Azure Synapse uses dedicated SQL pools and serverless SQL pools, while Microsoft Fabric uses Delta Lake format within OneLake.
    • Management: Fabric’s SaaS model simplifies management compared to Synapse’s more traditional infrastructure.
    • Integration Focus: Synapse is deeply integrated with the Azure ecosystem, whereas Fabric is more aligned with the broader Microsoft ecosystem, including Microsoft 365.

    If your primary focus is on handling large datasets with complex data processing needs and you prefer a more traditional infrastructure setup, Azure Synapse Analytics might be the better choice. On the other hand, if you are looking for a unified analytics platform with simplified management and strong integration with Microsoft 365, Microsoft Fabric could be more suitable.

    For more information, please refer to these links:
    https://3cloudsolutions.com/resources/microsoft-fabric-vs-azure-synapse-a-comprehensive-comparison/
    https://atlan.com/microsoft-fabric-vs-azure-synapse/
    https://video2.skills-academy.com/en-us/fabric/onelake/onelake-medallion-lakehouse-architecture
    https://video2.skills-academy.com/en-us/azure/databricks/lakehouse/medallion
    https://intellifysolutions.com/blog/azure-synapse-analytics-vs-microsoft-fabric/

    Hope this helps. Do let us know if you have any further queries.

    If this answers your query, do click Accept Answer and Yes for was this answer helpful. And, if you have any further query do let us know.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments

1 additional answer

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Vinodh247 18,101 Reputation points
    2024-09-04T05:31:45.5566667+00:00

    Hi DataCoder,

    Thanks for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.

    TLDR;

    Azure Synapse Analytics is a solid choice if you’re looking for a mature, robust platform with deep integration into Azure services, especially if your focus is on SQL-based data warehousing and spark big data processing.

    Microsoft Fabric might be more suitable if you prioritize ease of use, unified experiences, and tighter integration with Microsoft 365 and Power BI. In addition to what Synapse, ADF and DataLake can do, it is particularly appealing for organizations looking for a modern, cloud-native approach to data management and analytics.

    I have tried to summarize the key points as below.

    There are several factors to consider, including performance, scalability, ease of use, integration capabilities, and cost-efficiency. The choice completely depends on your specific requirements, team expertise, and existing ecosystem investments.

    Performance and Scalability

    Azure Synapse Analytics:

    Azure Synapse Analytics is designed to handle large-scale data processing. It integrates SQL technologies and Apache Spark, enabling parallel processing and in-memory analytics, which enhances performance for big data applications. The platform supports Delta Lake, allowing for efficient data management and optimized queries through features like time travel and ACID transactions, which are particularly beneficial for the Medallion architecture's bronze, silver, and gold layers.

    Microsoft Fabric:

    Microsoft Fabric also supports the Medallion architecture and is optimized for performance with its standardized use of Delta Lake format across various engines, including Power BI and SQL. Fabric's architecture allows for flexible deployment models, enabling users to create separate lakehouses for different data zones or to use a combination of lakehouses and data warehouses. This flexibility can enhance scalability based on organizational needs.

    Ease of Use

    Azure Synapse Analytics:

    Synapse provides a unified experience with a range of services, including Synapse Pipelines for orchestration and data transformation, and Spark pools for data engineering. This integration allows users to leverage both code-driven and graphical interfaces, catering to different user preferences and skill levels. The ability to mix SQL and Spark code within notebooks simplifies the development process.

    Microsoft Fabric:

    Fabric is designed to be user-friendly, especially for data engineers and business intelligence teams. It allows for straightforward implementation of the Medallion architecture with clear guidelines on data organization and management. The platform's support for multiple analytic engines working on a single data copy enhances usability and collaboration across teams.

    Integration with Other Services:

    Azure Synapse Analytics:

    Synapse integrates deeply with other Azure services like Azure Data Lake Storage, Power BI, Azure Machine Learning, and Azure Data Factory. It's ideal for those already invested in the Azure ecosystem.

    Microsoft Fabric:

    Fabric offers even more seamless integration across the Microsoft ecosystem, particularly with Power BI and Microsoft 365. It’s designed to make data collaboration and sharing more intuitive across different roles in an organization.

    Cost-Efficiency

    Azure Synapse Analytics:

    Synapse allows for pay-as-you-go pricing, which can be cost-effective depending on usage patterns. However, provisioning resources for peak loads can become expensive.

    Microsoft Fabric:

    Fabric is designed to optimize resource usage across workloads, potentially reducing costs through better resource sharing. Its pricing models are still being refined, but it aims to offer competitive pricing with the benefit of integrated features.

    Specific Features for Medallion Architecture

    Azure Synapse Analytics:

    Synapse is well-suited for Medallion architecture, given its ability to handle batch and streaming data, structured and unstructured data, and complex ETL processes.

    Microsoft Fabric:

    Fabric, with its unified data platform approach, can streamline Medallion architecture implementation by providing easier transitions between layers (bronze, silver, and gold). Its collaborative features may enhance productivity in multi-role environments.

    Please 'Upvote'(Thumbs-up) and 'Accept' as an answer if the reply was helpful. This will also help us close this thread and acknowledge the time spent by community volunteers like us.

    0 comments

Your answer

Answers can be marked as Accepted Answers by the question author, which helps users to know the answer solved the author's problem.