Request for topics...

Please post requests for topics or features that you would like to know about. This can be any of the SQL/TSQL language features or programmability in general. There are so many things to discuss about wrt SQL Server 2005 so it will be good to gauge interest of database developers/DBAs out there. Thanks.

 

--

Umachandar

Comments

  • Anonymous
    September 22, 2005
    Actually, I'd be interested in knowing if/how one might create a SQL Server service which accepted serialized .NET objects.

    Like an Expression Tree generated by LINQ, perhaps...

  • Anonymous
    September 22, 2005
    Uma

    Even though the DBMirror feature is dropped in the up-coming release, wanted to know How this DBMirror is implemented in SQL Server 2005 from the design prospect.

    Is it something Replication/Synchronization, what kind of technology you guys used and considering while implementing this. Is the mirroring is done only for committed transactions or even un-committed ones ?

    Would like to here from you what you guys implemented.

    Thanks

  • Anonymous
    September 22, 2005
    Oops..just got a link towards some qns I posted..

    Thanks anyway

  • Anonymous
    September 22, 2005
    I'd be interested to dig into the varchar(max) type, to understand how it is stored on the disk and if there are any perfomace impacts (like the "text" type)

  • Anonymous
    September 23, 2005
    We have a database that is created as part of our automatic system tests. These checks run each time we do a check in so having them run faster would be of great benefit.

    Sql server seems to spent a lot of time writing to the disk while creating the database and running all of our SQL to create the tables. It would be great if there was a way to tell Sql Server that we do not care if the database is lost when power goes down.

    Within each unit test it’s self we:
    a) start a transaction
    b) delete all rows from all tables
    c) add the data we need for the test.
    d) run the test
    e) abort the transaction.

    This works great, in that anyone can run a unit test on there local database without messing up any data they have carefully created in the application by hand. However it is a bit slow. Is there anyway to give sql server a “hint” that the transaction will NEVER be committed and therefore that it can do everything in RAM.

  • Anonymous
    September 25, 2005
    Coming from an Oracle background I'd like to see:

    1) Bitmap indexes
    2) Less restrictive indexes views
    3) More analytic functions (should be easy to add!)
    4) MERGE statements

    Also, I often find table pivoting frustrating in both Oracle and SQL Server. With the new function you still have to specify the column values - I would like SQL Server to dynamically display all the values automatically

  • Anonymous
    October 03, 2005
    I would love to see more tips on using Dynamic Management Views

  • Anonymous
    October 04, 2005
    In Integration Services, are there any plans for being about to input raw EBCDIC files that contain Packed Decimal formatted columns (Comp3, Zoned, etc)?

    This is something seen quite frequently in the healthcare industry and could be an excellent driver for migrating away from Oracle systems into Yukon.

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    Use of SQLCLR should allow you do this but it also has it's own restrictions/limitations in this release. Please check out the SQLCLR samples that come with the setup CD.
    As for LINQ, it is still a work in progress. And IMO it doesn't have the same expressive power of SQL. It will probably help people to write applications that use simple queries but I don't see myself using it though in any form soon.

    --
    Umachandar

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    October 06, 2005
    I do not know about the plans for Integration Services. You should search MSDN for blogs from members of that team and ask there.

    --
    Umachandar

  • Anonymous
    October 12, 2005
    Hi Umachandar

    I have following things to add:

    1. Code Library
    ===============
    I have always been a fan of collecting code that can be treated as repository. I'm pretty sure there are quite a number of people who write SAME code again & again, if these code(s) can be provided as LIBRARIES along with base-product and if there is any drive going on in that space, I would love to see what you guys are up-to.

    2. Coding Practices
    ===================
    There are quite a few way of writing code, if you guys can do some Best Practices on what / how to write some of the COMPLEX codes, may be that would help every body.

    3. Code Review
    ==============
    What are the most common problems you guys have seen from developers coding practices, such that people wont repeat the same mistakes

    4. SQL Errors
    =============
    If you guys can come up with a central repository for FAQ's nothing like it

  • Anonymous
    December 28, 2005
    Hi Umachandar,

    When writing a CLR UDT, is it possible to get see the name of the table and the field through reflection?

    Could you write a short demo on how to do that?

    Thanks,
    Filip.

  • Anonymous
    January 13, 2006
    Can anyone tell me if there's a reason why we souldn't ALWAYS use varchar(max)/nvarchar(max) instead of needlessly limiting our data in size (like in varchar(50))? It seems to me that with 2005 we don't need to use the "old" data types anymore. The question applies to table columns, stored procedure parameters, and variables.

    Thanks,

    Freaky

  • Anonymous
    February 08, 2006
    It was clear talking to the MS guys at the PDC that the focus has been on shipping Yukon and not the...

  • Anonymous
    February 08, 2006
    It was clear talking to the MS guys at the PDC that the focus has been on shipping Yukon and not the...

  • Anonymous
    February 28, 2006
    Is there a way to determine the number and makeup of the resultsets of a stored procedure?  I want to write a code generator to create class to encapsulate the resultsets.  I have many stored procedures which work with multiple tables and return information pulled from the parts of many tables.

  • Anonymous
    March 01, 2006
    The comment has been removed

  • Anonymous
    March 28, 2006
    The Dialog / Conversation model used in the DBMail subsystem.  I have a several mail servers (XMAIL - www.xmailserver.org) that dbmail will not have a polite conversation with.  I would like to see more information about how to modify the real dbmail settings, or a best-practices or guideline on either modifing or going around dbmail to talk to various ExternalMailService systems.

  • Anonymous
    May 22, 2006
    It was clear talking to the MS guys at the PDC that the focus has been on shipping Yukon and not the...

  • Anonymous
    June 27, 2006
    thank u

  • Anonymous
    September 18, 2006
    dear Umachandar
    A few days ago ,I read somewhere about  UPSERT/Merge  but I could not test it
    because the express edition of sql 2005 which I used ,dose not support this command
    I would be most grateful if you tell me what it used for and is it available
    in Express edition or not.

  • Anonymous
    September 21, 2006
    UPSERT/MERGE is a single DML statement that can be used to insert, update or delete rows from a table using another table source or query expression. Also, MERGE statement is part of the ANSI SQL standard so you can look there or Oracle documentation to know more about the syntax and details. SQL Server does not currently support UPSERT/MERGE statement so you will have to use individual INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements in a transaction.

    --
    Umachandar

  • Anonymous
    April 30, 2007
    PingBack from http://chaespot.com/mssql/2007/04/30/there-are-so-many-things-to-discuss-about/

  • Anonymous
    June 03, 2007
    It was clear talking to the MS guys at the PDC that the focus has been on shipping Yukon and not the