Who is using AlwaysOn

Several dozen customers are already running SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn in production. We have published case studies with some of these reference customers.

Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) : https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012/Mediterranean-Shipping-Company-MSC/Shipper-Supports-Expansion-by-Boosting-Speed-Control-and-Savings-with-Microsoft/4000011460

ServiceU: https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012/ServiceU/Online-Company-Reduces-Downtime-and-Helps-Its-Customers-to-Improve-Service/4000011506

Edgenet: https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012/Edgenet/Data-Provider-Supports-Growth-and-Gains-Competitive-Advantage-with-Microsoft/4000011528

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012/Beth-Israel-Deaconess-Medical-Center/Hospital-Improves-Availability-and-Speeds-Performance-to-Deliver-High-Quality-Care/5000000011

Sundio Group: https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Microsoft-SQL-Server-2012/Sundio-Group/Online-Travel-Firm-Boosts-Availability-and-Performance-to-Handle-Peak-Sales-Volumes-with-Microsoft-Solution/4000011822

For more customer case studies on AlwaysOn, search microsoft.com/casestudies:

https://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/Case_Study_Search_Results.aspx?Type=1&Keywords=AlwaysOn&LangID=46

Comments

• Anonymous
  January 21, 2016
  Are there any case studies which had reported good performance improvement by offloading "select only"  stored procs to read-only secondary ?  By moving "heavy select stored procs" from primary to read-only secondary would significantly lower the primary work load and the stored procs might even perform much better on a read-only secondary! This is my assumption, please advise if any of your customers have done this and are happy.